Ok, I admit. I'm behaving like an ostrich burying its head into the sand. There are reminders everywhere about having strategically plan for retirement i.e. knowing how much you need, and how much you need to start putting aside now, but truth be told, I am only looking at our current mortgage. Further planning is unbearable, mainly because I can't bear to look at how much more I should probably be saving, and how far I am from the target.
Conventional wisdom has it that we need two thirds of our last drawn salary every month to sustain our desired lifestyle, but how can that be achieved without continuing employment?
It was great relief to find out about CPF Life, a kind of compulsory annuity that provides a small monthly income after the age of 65, if the minimum sum is met. The allowance isn't much, but it does mean never having to actually be impoverished.
In the meanwhile, like a squirrel saving nut by nut its winter store, I purchase a high-yield stock occasionally, whenever there is cash to spare. Nope, I'm still not taking a good, hard look at my overall finances, though I probably should :( Maybe when I get my salary back after graduation :P
Little Fish and I had a brainwave yesterday. After retirement, maybe I will offer pet boarding and grooming for small animals at home. What a fun job it would be!
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Monday, October 28, 2013
Another tussle for love
Whitty wants some love. She wants Blackie to groom her face, and makes her request by squashing her face in front of him.
But Blackie wants some love too. He is pushing his face back at her.Hey you two, be nice and take turns.
Friday, October 25, 2013
007
Psst...there is a secret tunnel here. Let's see where it leads to...make sure nobody is following me.
It is a tiny tunnel, but nothing is too difficult for the rabbitI'm well hidden in the darkness. I cannot be seen, except for my white bobtail.
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
How to write job advertisements
The newly passed "Fair Consideration Framework" takes on discriminatory job advertisements to ensure that Singaporeans get an equal opportunity for each vacancy. No potential employer is allowed to express preference for applicants of foreign origins.
Perhaps in principle, the requirement to give Singaporeans a fair chance is a sensible one, as anecdotal evidence suggests that some employers tend hire people of their own nationality, overlooking Singaporeans who may be equally qualified. However, the actual implementation of these guidelines baffles me, especially how these guidelines restrict the way these advertisements are phrased, and what is perceived as discriminatory language.
It is commonly recognized that language conveys more than their literal meaning, and hence it could be exploited to hint rather than convey, and thereby pass on certain hidden agenda that would make sense only to those who are cued into the intended, true messages. Still, the new guidelines seem to take this concept to the extreme, by claiming discrimination in sentences that seem perfectly innocuous to me. Take for example:
"Singaporeans and Permanent Residents are welcome to apply".
This is no longer allowed under the Framework as it supposedly suggests that bias for foreigners. How does one arrive at this interpretation? I would have thought that it meant that Singaporeans are welcome!
As rumblings of discrimination continue, I worry that we overreact by perceiving it everywhere, or worse, claiming victimization for our own failings. After all, it must be accepted that not every Singaporean would be suitable for the jobs that are available, even if they happen to be unemployed.
Perhaps in principle, the requirement to give Singaporeans a fair chance is a sensible one, as anecdotal evidence suggests that some employers tend hire people of their own nationality, overlooking Singaporeans who may be equally qualified. However, the actual implementation of these guidelines baffles me, especially how these guidelines restrict the way these advertisements are phrased, and what is perceived as discriminatory language.
It is commonly recognized that language conveys more than their literal meaning, and hence it could be exploited to hint rather than convey, and thereby pass on certain hidden agenda that would make sense only to those who are cued into the intended, true messages. Still, the new guidelines seem to take this concept to the extreme, by claiming discrimination in sentences that seem perfectly innocuous to me. Take for example:
"Singaporeans and Permanent Residents are welcome to apply".
This is no longer allowed under the Framework as it supposedly suggests that bias for foreigners. How does one arrive at this interpretation? I would have thought that it meant that Singaporeans are welcome!
As rumblings of discrimination continue, I worry that we overreact by perceiving it everywhere, or worse, claiming victimization for our own failings. After all, it must be accepted that not every Singaporean would be suitable for the jobs that are available, even if they happen to be unemployed.
Monday, October 21, 2013
A picture of innocence
I was in the bathroom when suddenly loud crashes rang out from the yard. Wham, bang, thuds! Sounds like somebody dashing rapidly around the yard and kicking everything in his way!
Hurriedly, I rushed to check out what was happening. And this is what I saw:
Two fat rabbits lying lazily on the floor, as if they had never run, never kicked anything, and never made a mess.
Friday, October 18, 2013
Hamster in a bowl
The bowl is perfect for one hamster to sit and feast among his food. When we had two hamsters, they would both want to get in at the same time, and end up squeaking and squabbling a lot over it.
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
His view, her view
His view: Whitty gazing up at him limpidly in submission.
Her view: Blackie watching over her, alert and protective
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Waiting for Oct 17
I sold off all my short-duration bond funds, which are supposed to be one of the investments with the lowest risks. I can accept the low rewards that come from taking less risks, but now it seems like even this option is not available! In a financial catastrophe, cash is king. Actually, cash isn't, because what we have is fiat money based on faith. I would buy gold...except that gold had already been subject to too much speculation.
Maybe some experts would tell me I just made a wrong move. Maybe I'm being "Chicken Little". But I can't help remembering that during the Lehman Brother crisis, even boring old money market funds broke the dollar. So, imagine how much worse things could get if the mighty American government decides not to keep playing the game of musical chairs.
I must admit, I am pretty cross with Obama and the Republicans, though without knowing enough to know who is right or wrong, and who should be doing what.
Just don't default! Is all this just a game for those in power? Now, in the event of US government default, Obama is still going to be President. The congressmen are still going to be congressmen. Those who are rich and powerful are still going to be rich and powerful.
It only matters for the REST of us, yes, even if we are not Americans. I How can so few people determine the fate of so many others?
Maybe some experts would tell me I just made a wrong move. Maybe I'm being "Chicken Little". But I can't help remembering that during the Lehman Brother crisis, even boring old money market funds broke the dollar. So, imagine how much worse things could get if the mighty American government decides not to keep playing the game of musical chairs.
I must admit, I am pretty cross with Obama and the Republicans, though without knowing enough to know who is right or wrong, and who should be doing what.
Just don't default! Is all this just a game for those in power? Now, in the event of US government default, Obama is still going to be President. The congressmen are still going to be congressmen. Those who are rich and powerful are still going to be rich and powerful.
It only matters for the REST of us, yes, even if we are not Americans. I How can so few people determine the fate of so many others?
Friday, October 11, 2013
Marauding Rabbit
Don't they all say that rabbits are prey animals who prefer to keep their feet on the ground? Not this one. Behold, Whitty the brave marauder.
Knowing that all her treats and toys are kept on top of the cage, she makes repeated attacks whenever she has the chance. The bad girl tore through yet another bag of hay cubes.
There is no such thing as complete rabbit-proofing, only how much damage you are willing to endure.
Wednesday, October 09, 2013
Sleep tight
Potato - curled into a tight ball, head at the bottom. So cute :) Hamsters have the cutest sleeping poses.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)